Jump to content
ExtremeRavens: The Sanctuary

Great And Absolutely Fabulous I Told You So Flacco Article In Bleacher Report


rastaman831226

Recommended Posts

 

 

Flacco3. Baltimore Ravens quarterback Joe Flacco

 

Full deal: Six years, $120.6 million through 2018

 

Relevant terms: Flacco's cap figures are reasonable in 2014 ($14.8 million) and 2015 ($14.55 million), but then jump dramatically in 2016 ($28.55 million) and thereafter.

 

Analysis: In reality, Flacco leveraged the Ravens' Super Bowl victory in 2013 into what likely will be two paydays in a three- or four-year period. It's conceivable that the Ravens could carry a $28.55 million cap number in 2016, but it's more likely they'll need to extend his deal again either at that point or certainly by 2017, when his cap charge will be $31.5 million. Here's the catch: If the Ravens wanted to cut Flacco in 2016, he would consume $25.85 million in dead money against their cap that season. The end result is that to maintain cap health, the Ravens likely can't cut Flacco in 2016 or sit on his current deal. They'll have to give Flacco more upfront money -- and possibly an overall raise as well -- whether or not his play merits it.

WOW. They could June 1st cut him and make it a little palatable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude, your avatar makes you look like the King Of ReachArounds. What were you thinking and why were you thinking it when you came up with that one. Jeez, that's like a " Kick Me " sign.

Clever. Stick to mocking Joe, that's your true calling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe should be working out with his receivers during this bye week on a high school field somewhere.

instead he's out spending his money.

Nope...they can't get a high school field due to it being football season so he should set something up for Chinquapin Park.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope...they can't get a high school field due to it being football season so he should set something up for Chinquapin Park.

 

If the Ravens don't make the playoffs then this will be why.

I told you they should have signed Sanchez when he was on the cheap..........then they would have won it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The implication of early posts here was that this article says Flacco's contact is bad. It does not and that's not even the earlier thesis if the article. The article is about contacts that will influence future personnel decisions heavily.

 

Does Joe's for that bill? Of course. But not sure what the news is here.

 

Meanwhile, if this continues to devolve into some crap about avatars, in going to close it. Grow up, both of you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...