Jump to content


I hope this is a bunch of BS

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 papasmurfbell


    Hall of Famer

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,628 posts

Posted 06 June 2018 - 11:49 AM





Despite one failed attempt to bring Dez Bryant into the fold, the Baltimore Ravens might still have interest in signing the former Dallas Cowboys wide receiver.

During a video mailbag session on the team’s official website, the question of whether Bryant could still be in the team’s plans came up. And the answer to that question was yes.

As noted in the video report, Bryant would have to likely be willing to take less than what the Ravens initially offered, due to the fact that since he rejected their offer they have signed other players.

Furthermore, any move to bring Bryant in likely wouldn’t occur until later this summer. Still, given that Bryant hasn’t gotten any real nibbles from teams since Baltimore made its offer, nobody should be surprised if he ends up playing for the Ravens in 2018.




  • 0


I am better at this than my predecessor.

#2 tsylvester



  • Full Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,166 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 June 2018 - 03:14 PM

I would be shocked if he signed here, he clearly does not want to, so I doubt he will.

With that said, it wouldn't surprise me if the team the scam from office still wanted him
  • 0

#3 vmax


    Hall of Famer

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 32,157 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Catonsville Md

Posted 10 June 2018 - 08:00 AM

He doesn't want to play football.

He just wants one more big paycheck.

  • 0

“[Lamar] was amazing last year, and then they add in Mark Ingram,” Burleson said. “We forget how strong and angry of a runner he is. … [The Ravens] are just getting started. I think people assume that Lamar Jackson isn’t going to pass the ball this year, and I will tell you right now you are wrong. He’s going to light up the skies and torch the ground like he did last year.”

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users