ForceEight

Mike Keeney, the athletic director, yes sir.

;)

Turf is for wimps.

I absolutely loved that. I've always wondered why teams don't try backfield passes more often on short yardage, and that's precisely what that was, done with perfect execution.

Admittedly, I wear very little Ravens gear unless I'm at the game (which is weird, since I have four jerseys). I wear a lot of O's/Caps/Dale Jr./Syracuse, but I can't stand purple, etc. Should I change that for this week?

Rice is fine. They said he could have come back. McGahee is an enigma. However, I think he'll be better next week and/or beyond.

You're right, that is kid stuff. Specifically, it's 18-21 year old stuff, and that's why there is absolutely no argument for lowering the drinking age (which is what my argument headed for). It's a pipe dream to have alcohol abolished. It'll never successfully happen, and there's really no way that it could. I realize that there are too many factors that make restriction worth less than the benefits of getting rid of alcohol. I simply wish for it. That's the best answer I can give you.

The secondary coverage was absolutely fantastic, I think the best of the year. A lot of Campbell's yards came from backfield receivers, and considering the speed of the WRs, they did a good job.

I think we should be best friends.

Nah, Ryan and Forte are the leaders. It will be one of them. I wanna know what's so bad about Loyola/Calvert Hall!

Seahawks are running all over the Pats!

I've always been an ass. I guess you only notice it when I use that to rebut your opinions. BallT did a very good job summarizing my opinions and my argument. I'm not touching the pro-marijuana garbage. Haha! I'm uptight and need a drink! Ha! Never heard that before! Haha!

I really couldn't care less about your opinion of me or what I have to say, whatsoever. Believe it or not, entering the service isn't the only qualification required for an educated opinion, of which I'm fairly confident you lack in every way. You appear to enjoy living in cliches grasping at an imaginary utopian fairyland. However, you'll find that there are consequences to every action. And, you're right, it is about actions. I'd ask you what actions teenagers generally perform that merit for them the legality of these things, but as I said before, I really don't give a tiny Chad Johnson testicle about your holier-than-thou opinion. Mine is educated, and that seems to be more than can be said for yours as it stands, anyway.

Except that, you know, riding bikes isn't illegal. There is no argument whatsoever for a necessity of the government to protect illegal activities. Don't think the 20 year old should have to make that decision? Well, a few hours earlier, he also had the decision to make in regards to whether or not to drink. Oops. "Near-criminal" way it's treated? It IS criminal, and should be treated as such. Simple as that. Then I guess it's fair to say that I'm old enough to collect senior citizen benefits for my country! Oh, wait, that wouldn't make sense. The age for senior citizen recognition is set for a reason. Gosh. I guess that means the drinking age is set for a reason, too! Are you, like, serious? If laws that stopped people from doing things didn't exist, you'd probably not be here to argue such a ridiculous take. Pro-lower drinking age and pro-marijuana knuckleheads are the (sometimes) non-fatal scum of the earth.

Now selling my soul, if anyone wants a piece of that. Best offer. That's not even a nice suit. It came from Sears. On the clearance rack. It's not even my size.

And melt into oblivion like a crayon on pavement? No, thank you.

Go swim somewhere!

That's what I'm looking at.

Ooh. You're good. Don't concede it, but it's pure conjecture, and without the evidence necessary to discuss. The man is happy with the fact that his teammates are helping the team. The fact that he was called lazy in the past doesn't mean that this situation merits a return to the reputation.

I'm smart enough to know that it never will, but I'd like to hope that one day it'll come to successful fruition and work, for good.

I didn't say that it's not to be discussed. My point was that there's nothing to discuss. The salary cap and essential roster won't suddenly change before the end of the season, so those sorts of things can be left for then. McGahee is happy where he is, Harbaugh is satisfied with him there, and the team is performing to the necessary standards. I recognize that my car needs oil changes. At a certain time, I have to decide whether the oil I have is worth not spending money to replace it. However, it's never economically sound to buy and change the oil once a week; that's ridiculous. When the time comes, the issue can be handled, but while things are going well and no blame exists to be assigned, neither, then, exists any problem worth discussing. McGahee isn't a prima donna. He isn't lazy. He does care. He is worth the money we're paying him. He is simply taking the rest afforded to him during/after (whatever) injury, as his teammates carry the load for him. I'll end by applauding your destruction of The College. :lol:

Troy's no Syracuse, though. Cuse is a pretty major city, and I'm actually a huge fan of cold/snowy weather. I survive by not attending classes. :P

Oh, and let me crush this one, too. Mason was complaining in 2006. You know, the year McNair was QB? He never had any public issue with Boller.

http://www.latimes.com/sports/football/nfl...0,3517220.story

Yeah, but don't tell them. I'm a rambunctious college kid full of rebellion and looking to get into trouble. Right?!