papasmurfbell

Yeah let them go down 2 players on the OL and watch things get really bad. Not much for a WR or RB to do if the OL is crap.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8jTEz_0TAg

OK stalker.

Hurst, Henry, the WR in just a few days. This is how Harbs teams fare.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2792741-how-long-should-joe-flaccos-leash-be-on-ravens-starting-qb-job I think this talk is getting silly. I expect Joe to be benched but Jackson doing well against basically the kind of talent he saw last yr is no big deal.

I just don't expect Yanda to be the guy from the past.

I don't think Goose 2.0 will ever bounce back. Having your whole knee shredded is pretty much death to an NFL career. Dex proved that to me.

Not a whole lot you can do about the OL now. I have always seen that as the achiles fpr the team.

Also that the team and the league worked out a very deferential deal for Rice and they had to throw him under the bus to save face.

They should change the PUP list rule so guys kike Hurst can be used on it. Why burn a roster spot on a guy for 4-6 weeks or the return from the IR designation?

When there is positives then they get acknowledged.

I never claimed to be classy. I don't think he will translate. I made that determination from his last yr at UL and his combine. You don't avoid my posts. You love to just sit and be critical of me.

Can you suck a dick? Stupid question you do for every pro raven person you can find. Rodgers and Jackson had two totally different styles in college. You know these stats are right here on the net. They are so easy to find. Rodgers never below 60% and Jackson has never been there. Also Rodgers could always throw a nice ball and most of Jackson's are dying ducks. Try to have a clue when you post something. The thing is Wilson can throw from the pocket and run. Same with Rodgers. Baker is in that mold. The question is do they want to stay there and throw or break? If their goal was to change him and that was the project it was stupid. It will set the team up for yrs of failure.

No first round QB is a project. 3rd or 5th rounders are projects. Especially when you trade up to get back into the first you expect him to perform reletively quickly.

But a QB sets a team back by 5 yrs when they don't make it.

https://nflspinzone.com/2018/08/22/baltimore-ravens-lamar-jackson-spells-disaster-entire-organization/ I agree. I have said I don;t think he can do it in the NFL. I also said Ozzie screwed the team on the way out the door.

I think no matter what this is his last yr here.

They would save money if they did cut him.

He was a true rookie. I don't doubt Walsh did a ton to mold him. I just think he would have been good in any well run org. Say the Skins had gotten him. I think he would have won SBs under Gibbs. Same with Parcells.

Steve Young couldn't fix TB. That was in no way shocking. He was pretty good in the USFL before being in TB.

You are seeing just like I am on him being #2. On a full yr of learning we are in disagreement. I don't think his issues are fixable. They should have been worked on yrs ago. He is set now.

After last night I think Jackson has proved he is not ready to start. I don't think HArbs is in a position to have the luxury of 2 QBs this yr.

Dixon looked very good last night.

Build demand for a bidding war in a few weeks.

You have to wonder if the lesser leg is worth the extra roster spot for most teams. I agree I like him.