papasmurfbell

He never should have been signed.

No they don't. I thought the new strength and conditioning coach was supposed to deal with this.

I saw that since he was due to get 4 games already that it could very likely be 14 games. Their D is shot.

Long overdue.

The Ravens should have structured the deal here more like that.

For over a month now when I would come by I was getting a major virus warning. Was anyone else getting it?

It really is more than 1 now. The last two have not been amazing. I would bet that is exactly the issue.

Yuo can't be handcuffed by a kicker.

You should have chosen Sanders. But yes every state sets their own polling rules.

I was thinking Joe would force his way over to Den last yr. I am sure Kubes would have taken him.

Go get Kubes back.

Then you should ask Bill how he does it. He just took Philly to the cleaners.

No. Players that have value to others but you just can't afford to pay or you thik they have topped out on production. You can't trade your trash. Only sports talk radio callers think you can trade trash. I would have traded Suggs before he got his FA deal. I would have traded Cmac before he got his. Yanda should have been traded before and kept KO.

No I would trade guys who you see as not having a future here to teams and accumulate picks. It is what I have been saying for yrs.

No. You get as many picks as you can. Spot a guy maybe not in the next draft bu 2-3 down the line and make sure you have the ammo to get him. Develop him and keep him for the long haul.

Why would I want Boller. I was pissed when they drafted him. Hell I was one of the first to say he would be a bust and ppl said he would come around. I think they should have moved onto a completely new option already.

Then the dems need to pay for the voting machines and the staff at he polls. Since you also pay for these things you should be able to vote in the primary.

They control who can vote in a primary. I don't like that. I like the Cali model of the top 2 r 3 fro the primary move onto the GE regardless of party.

If the candidates are not hooked up with a party then the parties can't control the ballots ina state by state basis. Also when you get in the voting booth you can't just select every D or R person on the ballot. Normally I would agree on a third party. But with ppl hating trump and clinton so much they may finally decided screw these parties who else is out there. If CNN keeps giving Johnson a platform to talk it only lets more ppl see him and decide he is better than those two. He gets to 15% and he can humiliate them in a debate and then all bets are off.

Quinipiac has a devastating look at Hillary polling right now.

The cleaning wipes sound like a pretty interesting invention.

With their negatives I thinnk the 3rd party will do better than them. If it goes 4 way then it will be chaos but if the never hillary ot trump jump behind Stein or Johnson they can get the 270.

I am for the Ventura idea. You can have parties but candidates can't be part of them. True she is. That has been my argument to her supporters the whole time. The one thing is I think her judgemetn sucks. That is supposed to be a plus for her and you look at her decisions and they have been disasters. Also I think she will push the TPP through and I think that is end game for the US economy.

BTW I didn't write it. Also Timmons is on their list.