papasmurfbell

All players say it. It means nothing. 99% of the time it is only about the cash they are shown.

The team that offers yr 3 and makes the whole deal $6-7.5 mil.

They weren't the last couple. Does anyone know what the circumstances the dogs death were?

I think that says more about the FO and coaching staff looking at the talent available to them than it does about Forsett. Then it gets to the group think of the FO's that dismissed him on reputation. I am with Crav and saying the Ravens can find his replacement via the draft. I liked the description of the Yal RB in the Sau.

I wanted Graham. How many bball players do we have to see?

Well then he should have made that call and gone all the way with it. It is like Cam making Mason, Housh, and Q run a Coriel offense. They are not in the ingredients to make that work.

good question.

Could be. It depends on the cap. The two top receiving threats are FA's this yr. They may not be able to afford him.

Then Harbs shoudl have said thx but no thanks to Caldwell. We aren't running your offensive system. Don't mix and match to the detriment to the on field performance.

Forsett was good. I don't know that he will not have nearly the success next yr. He is 30 and RB's are normally breaking down by then. The Ravens can't put all their eggs in his basket. The Ravens can find his replacement very easily. Because he knows these things as fact until they turn out untrue.

But he was still playing the position that has the shortest shelf life in the NFL.

Juan was hired as run game coordinator. He was meddling in 2013. He is the one variable that made the run game putrid. He started pushing ZBS on a Caldwell offense that looked like it didn't need it.

They over spent for Rice. They have let emotion cloud judgement in the past.

No not really. How often do you see UFA CB's or QB's be Pro Bowlers?

No I just see where you can find a RB easily. Foster, Charles, Morris, and so many more undrafted or dratfed very low and they have been some of the best in the league.

Definitely I don't deny that. I like a run first priority. Justin is quite replaceable. The position is a dime a dozen. 100% agreed.

The 2010 GB team ran with Brandon Jackson and 703 yds. NE with Kevin Faulk. The 96 Packers didn't have a steady running game. It isn't 100% needed. RB's can be had cheap and young and perform well.

Come on. There is no RB in the league that is that important.

I wouldn't get pressed over Justin. He can be replaced easily.

I don't see an issue from what 9 yrs ago?

I saw this elsewhere. It makes me trust the hire more.

I don't really like this hire.

Thx for the info.