No, Ray Rice is not Jamal Lewis. I don't even know how a comparison can be made when they aren't even the same type of back. I disagree with you about Rice not being able to make something happen when there is no hole. Rice is an all-purpose back who finds holes that aren't there and sheds defenders off of him on those long runs. (That's about the only kind of similiarity I can see between both backs.) He did it for the first two years he was here. He just never got the touchdowns, but he was the workhorse that moved the offense down the field. It was just McClain or McGahee that ran the short distances in the redzone. In Lewis' first three playing years (he missed his second year, which was after the Super Bowl win), Lewis had 309, 308, and 387 rushing attempts in those seasons. Rice has NEVER been near that (107, 254 and currently 231). Rice averaged 4.2 and and 5.3 yards per carry and Lewis averaged 4.4 (2000) and 5.3 (2003) in the best years of his career. Not much of a difference there production wise (except Lewis had way more touches), but Rice has averaged essentially half of the number of fumbles. The problem, in my opinion, is that, as you said, he isn't being utilized properly. Lewis played under the QB circus, when teams knew we were going to run, so his numbers are impressive. Rice's numbers should be moreso but aren't for two reasons: 1) he is more of a receiving threat than Lewis ever was (he averaged 14.3 yards per gain and Rice averages 34.5); and 2) he isn't being utilized properly!