Jump to content

We've recently updated our software. Please report any issues you may experience.

Geronimo

Heap not worthy of the "ring of honor"

Recommended Posts

Mackey and "Scrap" Heap played in two totally different era's , that argument doesn't wash. so if your numbers are better than John Stallworth at WR then you should make the hall of fame? "Scrap" Heap was an average TE, to correct myself, he wasn't a bum but he was also far from ROH worthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

have you looked at his numbers?

 

I posted his numbers, they were very good, and yes hEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAP is worthy of the ROH, Again, Heap had Kyle Boller as his primary QB,

Edited by cravnravn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was a good soldier and did as he was told.

this statement applies to most NFL players, that doesn't make them ROH worthy. You guys are making Heap out to be something that he wasn't. the guy was a decent NFL TE , thats it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please enlighten us as to what brought you to the conclusion that Heap doesnt belong in the ROH..Numbers were posted but you choose to side step them and shoot them down with the "different era" shot.

 

To this day Unitas is still the greatest QB of all, and yes he played in a different era.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please enlighten us as to what brought you to the conclusion that Heap doesnt belong in the ROH..Numbers were posted but you choose to side step them and shoot them down with the "different era" shot.

 

To this day Unitas is still the greatest QB of all, and yes he played in a different era.

you're the one that posted the numbers of Heap and someone from a different era, to try and make Heap look like something more than he is. why didn't you post Heap numbers with someone most of us could at least say we have seen play? you're really reaching now Crave, so because Unitas is the best qb of all times and he played back in the day, that means that Heap can put up average numbers over a ten year career in the 2000's and because there similar to Mackey's, it legitimizes Heaps career. Bottomline "Scrap" Heap was average and the numbers you posted are the proof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they're average numbers then why is it OK for Mackey to be in the ROH and HOF with lesser numbers, I dont buy the different era crap, many a QB have better numbers then Unitas, but hes still considered the greatest.

 

Unfortunate for Heap that he was here during our franchises probably worst ever draft pick.If Heap was drafted 6 years later, he'd have numbers up there with Gonzo...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unitas plays QB and it's easier to compare QB's in different era's because the position carries wins and losses with it, thats how come Unitas can still be considered the greatest of all time at qb. furthermore compare Mackeys numbers with TE's in his era and see how he stacks up , now do the same with Heap and tell me what you come up with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...