papasmurfbell

But proved it. He now like if the Ravens had kept him would have been a place holder until their future is ready. Clean drafted what I think is the best QBs in the class. I don't think Tyrod will be the starter in a yr.

No where am I located and what is the local team that is talked about in that area?

But it was possible to do with Tyrod though. They proved it.

Joe has never gotten the footwork. Some guys can't be fixed with accuracy.

Totally agree with that. Were the Cards pandering?

Where am I and where are they?

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ravens-will-multiple-women-coaching-analytics-apprenticeships-summer-180835581.html I give them a lot of credit going in this direction.

Exactly.

I don't think he will play well at QB. At least they can get him work in other spots when QB doesn't pan out.

They had better WRs bc Taylor was cheap. He would have been cheap here too. They would not have had to give Taylor that long a deal. He signed a 3 yr 3 mil deal in Buf. Why would the Ravens have had to go higher?

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/23771497/baltimore-ravens-quarterback-lamar-jackson-lining-other-positions-team-practices Now that in an interesting turn of events. If he doesn't pan out as a QB at least he is getting some reps at other spots.

So now you put it off and now the fans have revolted anyways. The team has been mediocre for a while now and it looks like it will for sometime to be so it is going to take a while to get them back. Why would it take 10 yrs to find a new QB. There have been several in the last 5 yrs who have been drafted and been great. Also Taylor at this point it better than Joe. He was the yr after he left. Joe's cap number has been more of a hindrance than anything else.

Tyrod should have been a hold over. There should have drafted a QB a yr or two later.

It could be better but they don't try.

Like any team it mirrors the coach.

https://www.baltimorebeatdown.com/2018/6/11/17449458/what-if-joe-flacco-wasnt-re-signed-after-super-bowl-xlvii-tyrod-taylor They are starting to ask the questions now. They are just not progressing along to the inevitable place the questions should go.

It is one of the many things that come up with a regular Ravens news search. That said there is little info. I also like taring them apart.

http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/ravens/ravens-insider/bs-sp-ravens-training-camp-0611-story.html

https://ebonybird.com/2018/06/11/joe-flaccos-fault-interception-no-4/ This article is such trash. All assumptions. I do think Jackson will be a disaster. I have no faith in this staff fixing his problems.

agreed. That is my issue with having Tucker on the team. They just think we can get 3.

https://ebonybird.com/2018/06/10/baltimore-ravens-3-reasons-they-will-improve-in-the-red-zone/ Really? Crabtree may or may not be effective. But the other two a giant assumptions. Most rookie TEs are not that good. This OL being much better I debate vigorously.

Cle has had highs and lows? The Bears? The Jets? The Bucs? Some pretty much just have lows. I see this franchise going ion that direction.

I wonder if they are like FB. When you are talking about them they start pushing themselves on you. I wonder how much of the list flew by the last 2 yrs.

Misdirection.