tgann68 Posted January 9, 2015 Posted January 9, 2015 That's all the Patriots did this year. They won 2 more games at 12-4 then the Ravens did at 10-6 with the luxury of a weaker division. if the Ravens played the Yets Fins and Bills 6 times a year instead of Pissburgh Cincy and that other team we would be rolling out 12 win seasons as well. Again the AFCN rolls into the playoffs with the most divisional entries at 3. But their is a reason Brady hasn't won a Super Bowl in 10 years and it's bc what Works for them in the regular season gets stomped out by harder teams more battle proven with heavy pass rush such as the 2012 Ravens and 2007 Giants. I don't think the Pats can run on the Ravens D leaving Brady just a shorter field throwing version of Rothelisberger. No real deep threat thereby running into our front 7 or teeth of the Ravens Defense playin the best they have all year. Also the Battle hardened Playoff and Super Bowl tested Joe Flacco we have today isn't the same guy that threw a game ending pick in Pissburgh so many years ago as a rookie. His playoff record and recent stats 17 tds and 1 interception and 10-4 record speaks to that. If I'm the Patriots I'm deeply concerned. Go Ravens!!! ;)
vmax Posted January 9, 2015 Posted January 9, 2015 Hey....the Ravens played the Little Sisters of the Poor to get to 10-6.
tsylvester Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 Hey....the Ravens played the Little Sisters of the Poor to get to 10-6. right, how many teams with winning records did the Ravens beat, even counting Pitt, twice now....
tgann68 Posted January 10, 2015 Author Posted January 10, 2015 Would you rather play Miami Buffalo and the yets 6 times a year or Pissburgh Cincy and Cleveland? One of the reasons teams have losing records is the level of competition within their division. my point is the same regarding the Gaytriots every year... Try win there division and take home field by getting handed 4/5 divisional games no matter it's a layup.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.