Jump to content
ExtremeRavens: The Sanctuary

Comments Welcome


cravnravn

Recommended Posts

If a woman has a baby, and some time later the baby is taken away from her, does that mean she never had a baby?

how about 6 babies to 2 babies

 

if a woman gives birth in a house then moves to another house and another woman moves in to that house and gives birth does that mean the 2nd woman has two babies

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Epic Fail

not as bad you claiming 5 rings

THAT'S EPIC FAIL

but to me me it's freaking hysterical and proves that the ravens and their fans are wannabes

let me know when you folks achieve a DYNASTY

LOL

LOL

LOL

LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not as bad you claiming 5 rings

THAT'S EPIC FAIL

but to me me it's freaking hysterical and proves that the ravens and their fans are wannabes

let me know when you folks achieve a DYNASTY

LOL

LOL

LOL

LOL

 

How many years do you call a dynasty? caus going to the AFCCG 3 out of the past 5, we are on our way to being a dynasty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

How many years do you call a dynasty? caus going to the AFCCG 3 out of the past 5, we are on our way to being a dynasty

afccg???????

LOL

LOL

LOL

WE DO THAT EVERY DECADE

 

lagging tomato

KETCHUP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here in terms you might understand..You have multiple babys daddys, they still your babys, right?

LOL

hell yes I've been to Baltimore so I have seen your multi-babydaddy

LOL

funny you should apply Baltimore characteristic to other peoples

 

JUST LIKE CLAIMING ANOTHER TEAMS RINGS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how about 6 babies to 2 babies

 

if a woman gives birth in a house then moves to another house and another woman moves in to that house and gives birth does that mean the 2nd woman has two babies

 

No, but the house can say two babies were born there. :thumbup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

How many years do you call a dynasty? caus going to the AFCCG 3 out of the past 5, we are on our way to being a dynasty

You gotta win the big one to be considered a dynasty nobody considers the bills a dynasty. The Steelers went to 3 super bowls in 5 years does that make them a dynasty nope if they won 3 out of 5 then yes.
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You gotta win the big one to be considered a dynasty nobody considers the bills a dynasty. The Steelers went to 3 super bowls in 5 years does that make them a dynasty nope if they won 3 out of 5 then yes.

 

Not entirely true, on a number of counts.

 

A sports dynasty is a team that dominates their sport or league for multiple seasons or years. Such dominance is often only realized in retrospect. The most widely-accepted sports dynasties are those with multiple championships over a limited period of time, either consecutively with or without interruption (e.g., UCLA Bruins men's basketball from 1964 to 1975), and The Alabama Crimson Tide (NCAA football) 2009–present); or non-consecutively (e.g., the Oakland/Los Angeles Raiders of the late 1970s and early 1980s or the Liverpool football team of the 1980s). In a few cases, a dominant team without championships might be recognized as a dynasty (e.g., the Buffalo Bills of the early 1990s or the Minnesota Vikings of the 1970s).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Not entirely true, on a number of counts.

 

A sports dynasty is a team that dominates their sport or league for multiple seasons or years. Such dominance is often only realized in retrospect. The most widely-accepted sports dynasties are those with multiple championships over a limited period of time, either consecutively with or without interruption (e.g., UCLA Bruins men's basketball from 1964 to 1975), and The Alabama Crimson Tide (NCAA football) 2009–present); or non-consecutively (e.g., the Oakland/Los Angeles Raiders of the late 1970s and early 1980s or the Liverpool football team of the 1980s). In a few cases, a dominant team without championships might be recognized as a dynasty (e.g., the Buffalo Bills of the early 1990s or the Minnesota Vikings of the 1970s).

the minnasota lakers have multiple nba championships and the milwalkee braves have a dynasty from atlanta

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Not entirely true, on a number of counts.

 

A sports dynasty is a team that dominates their sport or league for multiple seasons or years. Such dominance is often only realized in retrospect. The most widely-accepted sports dynasties are those with multiple championships over a limited period of time, either consecutively with or without interruption (e.g., UCLA Bruins men's basketball from 1964 to 1975), and The Alabama Crimson Tide (NCAA football) 2009present); or non-consecutively (e.g., the Oakland/Los Angeles Raiders of the late 1970s and early 1980s or the Liverpool football team of the 1980s). In a few cases, a dominant team without championships might be recognized as a dynasty (e.g., the Buffalo Bills of the early 1990s or the Minnesota Vikings of the 1970s).

I like how you left the Steelers of the 70s out but even those teams made it to the championship game not the game before the championship. I don't consider the Steelers a dynasty from 05 to 10 if they would have beaten the pack then I would. I could see the argument for the bills I mean even though they didn't win any 4 straight super bowls is impressive. There's no denying the ravens have been one of the elite franchises as of late but they aren't on the dynasty level yet win a few more super bowls in the next 5 years then we can talk about.
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the minnasota lakers have multiple nba championships and the milwalkee braves have a dynasty from atlanta

LOL

 

I just slaughtered the spelling of the two teams

lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like how you left the Steelers of the 70s out but even those teams made it to the championship game not the game before the championship. I don't consider the Steelers a dynasty from 05 to 10 if they would have beaten the pack then I would. I could see the argument for the bills I mean even though they didn't win any 4 straight super bowls is impressive. There's no denying the ravens have been one of the elite franchises as of late but they aren't on the dynasty level yet win a few more super bowls in the next 5 years then we can talk about.

imho

Dee didn't have to mention the steelers steel because that's a givin when it comes to DYNASTY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like how you left the Steelers of the 70s out but even those teams made it to the championship game not the game before the championship. I don't consider the Steelers a dynasty from 05 to 10 if they would have beaten the pack then I would. I could see the argument for the bills I mean even though they didn't win any 4 straight super bowls is impressive. There's no denying the ravens have been one of the elite franchises as of late but they aren't on the dynasty level yet win a few more super bowls in the next 5 years then we can talk about.

 

I didn't write it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come on Dee you gotta know by now my comments like that are straight jokes. If I mention Lewis and murder it's a joke as well.

unlike your gay jokes which are stillhurtin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lmao I don't think I've ever made a gay joke. Gay, straight or indifferent it doesn't bother me. In fact my kids god father is gay.

you're the one stating it was a straight joke :fishin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...