My take on the season

[GrubberRaven]

well played

[ForceEight]

But, in the interest of fairness:

 

[papasmurfbell]

Still wondering why the offense is the talk of the town after we have up 43 points. Missed opportunities in offense early? Certainly.

 

But this team wasn't going to score 40 points in Pitt.

Well TO's accounted for at least 10 points.

[52isUnstoppable]

But, in the interest of fairness:

 

 

Haha. The dark ages of Ravens football. That man single handedly squandered like 4 superbowl caliber defenses.

[papasmurfbell]

 

Haha. The dark ages of Ravens football. That man single handedly squandered like 4 superbowl caliber defenses.

How was that Boller's fault? He didn't draft himself. He didn't make himself starter out of the game. That blame sits squarely at Billick and Ozzies feet.

[52isUnstoppable]

How was that Boller's fault? He didn't draft himself. He didn't make himself starter out of the game. That blame sits squarely at Billick and Ozzies feet.

 

Because he sucked. If he didn't suck we could have won multiple superbowls with that defense.

[papasmurfbell]

But again he didn't pick himself. It is not his job to evaluate him and decide where to draft him. That was all Billick and Ozzie.

[dc.]

Well TO's accounted for at least 10 points.

Certainly - they accounted for two touchdowns. But one was a fumble, so not sure how that's Joe.

[dc.]

I'd like to pick it up and counter with:

 

Yes. Joe has made a bad play.

[papasmurfbell]

Certainly - they accounted for two touchdowns. But one was a fumble, so not sure how that's Joe.

Joe wasn't the issue. Points would have been taken from Pitt and maybe points added to the Ravens without the turnovers. The issue was you saying the D didn't do their job. I only was pointing out that the offense gave points to Pitt.

[dc.]

I was only saying the conversation had degraded to Joe, which seems silly in the grand scheme of a loss like this. And when we add two losses to Cincy that certainly involve all elements of the game failing, but especially blown leads on big plays by the secondary, it just seems odd that all the focus goes the other way.

[papasmurfbell]

I was only saying the conversation had degraded to Joe, which seems silly in the grand scheme of a loss like this. And when we add two losses to Cincy that certainly involve all elements of the game failing, but especially blown leads on big plays by the secondary, it just seems odd that all the focus goes the other way.

The rules have been made to help the QB and WR's.

[dc.]

Sure. But two serious against Cinch an MD this team is 7-2. Doesn't make Joe any better or worse, but it's all irrelevant.

 

Good teams win games and close games. This team is struggling with both. And everyone is at fault at the most basic levels.

[papasmurfbell]

Do you have auto correct going?