tsylvester

No, I am giving 13, sorry, meant to say minus, which is a plus for the Ravens secodary. 3rd and 8 with a gran blitz on and they don't expect a quick, short throw; brilliant! Cover two, with only two receivers on the field, one on each side, and they hug the middle, ignore their side fo the field... Good "Luck" with your ponies.....

Hmm, likely without Suggs, not that it has mattered. Even the anouncers were shocked to see how little no matter how it looked, Cam had been sacked or pressured. If not for an errant snap and some out of the box play calling, the Panthers likely score. No picks this year, oh wait, one, by a defensive tackle.... Luck is gonna carve them up.

I'll take the Colts plus 13 for $500 Marv. Luck will carv up the junior highschool secondary of the Ravens.

I am sure it was mailed registered, signature required so the other part will be easy,,,,,,, Now, will it be a he said she said, bueller, bueller, oh excuse me, Mueller, Mueller...........

Brown has a big body great hands, but not much jitter, struggles to get open without rub routes. Jones, ha, he has more drops than catches this year...

Hurst is the best option. Prior to his college injury, he was considered to be a top prospect, even with his penchant for getting lazy in his technique, attributed to poor conditioning in college. Now, with better coaching, he should be fine, not perfect as of yet, but certainly a heck of a lot better than the aforementioned choices. Jeepers, bringing in Reid or Gradkowski would not only leave Flacco half dead, but the running game as well. Pathers have a solid front four, a very good, rangy MLB too boot.

They had him in the form of Cox. Both were/are over rated and liabilities, especially in big games. He might get his head turned around, but it is highly unlikely.

I can't see why not, they currently have the upper hand and if denied, it will really look like a cover up.

The NFLPA has now hired their own investigator to look into this....

Just like when he didn't have the thought, have the desire, have a care in the world what was on the tape, never crossed his mind.... Just like, oh why bother,

Nor will it be; "our apology and willingness to work on a new plan, ready to be released sometime in the next decade is enough for the fans to know, just give me your money."

He is trying out with the Saints, who wanted him before last season, but he took bigger bucks to go west... No one wants him and plenty of teams need a cornerback.

No one here has made them out of be such a thing max. Contrary to some, cough, cough, who have made Biscut & the Ravens out to be....

3 more games, he is a 3rd time offender, no way they drop his time down, especially not now with all the Biscut & Goody crap going on now.... Move over ren & stimpy, it's Biscut & Goody time!

Fitting, keep her on the team and let her keep her captianship. Women can't be abusers, blacks can not be rascist, gay can't be straight-aphobes, let the list go on.......

I guess Nixon was innocent too, afterall, the media uncovered the truth there, they must have made it up too.............

PTI has not come on yet, Golic was not saying the Ravens were right and the report wrong. He was saying what some others have said; ok, they all got it wrong, they all lied at some point, at this point what matters is to fix things, Oh and in case you didn't know how real shows are run, they plan every thing, so each takes a side, so that people watch, confrontation sells. More truth for you, I know some local shows run by certain people don't do that, they just kiss.

TBird, as I said, we see, hear only what we want. Proof- Um, luckily I did- See, you missed that part. You also missed the part where you said and I quote- And I replied that Sports Center is just that; sports and news and since they spent most of the day yesterday covering this, they had to let it lie back (pun intended) so their other shows could cover it, again, as they ALL did yesterday. There is ample proof of at least one lie from Biscut, I pointed it out quite clearly for you, but as you did with my other remarks, that I quoted, you missed them. I've been around for a log time, luckily , I know a lot about how the league opperates, how teams opperate, how some supposed "websites" opperate, and how they all spin the truth. As I defined the other day, to me, a lie is either saying false things, telling half truths to make a point or using the truth to decieve another. In this instance, the Ravens, Biscut, is guilty of atleast one of those definitions, the leggue of all of them. I chose to root for the Ravens and will continue, albeit on a much lesser scale, not because of a coach or one player, not because they win, not because of an owner. Rather because I love the game, they are my home team and I love them as a team, good & bad, seasons & people. Maybe if you could step back for a moment you would see, in real life, people lie, teams lie, mostly because it is all about money. That is the major reason Biscut is "speaking out" to keep you lining his pockets.

Luckily, I can choose for whom to root or not to root, there is no question. You made a statement, I showed you that you were, luckily, a bit off and you retort with opinion and insults; Nice, we are so lucky to have you around. Oh and which media is saying DV is CAUSED by? Some are asking the question if SOME OF THESE INSIDENTS ARE RELATED, because we know of at least one case, where it was quite obvious when the K.C player couldn't handle his mental illness caused by concusions and killed his girl friend and him self. See, you chose to hear only what you want to hear and when called on it, fail to admit it, and name call others to deflect. Luckily, you can repent, you are not Biscut, right? Seems to be his motto. And if/when Ozzie retires after the season, maybe your memory will be good enough to remember, that I luckily told you. Why should it go away? In their, the legaue's and Biscut's own words- we want change, we wil hold our selves to a higher standard, everyone deserves a second chance, one mistake should not cost a good man his job. So if we want change, then, that means holding them, all of them, accountible. Luckily we have social media to keep this going until there is real change.,

As I mentioned, Mke & Mike covered it again, now First Take is going to cover it, again, I am sure, SVP and his show will cover it, again, the list will grow as the shows come on today. They all covered the press conference yesterday, and every show that came on yesterday after it, talked about it. NBC's morning fluff show, Today, talked about it, again, I am pretty sure the other fluff mrning shows did as well. This is not going away, though people are getting tired of talking about and want to see what the changes will be.

I wil bet and would love to truly know how hard Biscut fights the NFLPA to get cap relief for players who act out and thus, get cut.... This should be interesting to see if the Ravens, Panthers, Vikes, and Niners get relief for next year's cap....

I am lucky to have this conversation. I was not speaking of Lewis, but of Stallworth, whom I have mentioned in this thread, who, Biscut mention in the presser, but only in the context of an employee, not as a player. So he, Donte, has every bit to do with this convrsation, Luckily, Biscut mentioned him in the presser, along with Cris Carter, who was not very happy that Biscut left out that Cris was signed a week later with the Vikes after being cut by the Eagles. Meanwhile, many owners have said Rice will never play a down in the NFL again. So again, I ask, is hitting a women worse than killing some one? Luckily I can ask that question again. I know Biscut apologized, again, just as he did in the letter he sent to the ticket holders and in the canned interview he did. He repeated it over & over yesterday. It is what he apologized for, it is not being honest. Again, luckily I can say this; why not say, admit, what everyone knows? That they cut Rice simply because of the pressure from the fans, the media? Proof, luckily, is in his own words that if the league had suspended Rice for 6-8 games, he would still be on the team- Biscut's own words. So Biscut did not cut Rice for hitting a women, he cut him because of outrage by fans & media. Maybe we should have had a bigger ground swell about who to draft, that way they draft who we want, not who they think should play for the team; luckily the team doesn't work that way.

Did you happen to hear Biscut confirm that his head of security did in fact speak with the Jersey PD about the tape and that it was described to the chief how horrifying it was. That the cheif then went to Cass to tell him about the tape? Oh but Biscut dodged it by saying the tape was wobbly and blurry, you know the tape we all saw. No matter the quality it was clear what happened. Biscut even implied the old; the story changes with each person who shares it, mantra. Did you not find it funny that Biscut never talked with Ray before the video came out? His words by the way, in another canned interview. Did you hear him dodge the question about Ozzie fully siding with what Ray told them, how the video confirmed what Ray said?

As I said, Biscut said if Rice had been suspended for 6- games, he would stil be on the team. Thus, his statement that Ray lied to them about what happened in the elevator is false. His assertion that they cut him because of his lie is in fact, a lie. They clearly cut him because of the outrage. So, just admit it. Sports Center is only one program, they have to show sports. But Mike & Mike and the other shows, are standing by the OTL story. So yes, you too are only haring what you want to hear. It makes no sense, none, to sign a player who killed a person, but cut a player who hit one; NONE. It makes no sense that Biscut would not want to see the tape, never thought to see the tape before making his decision on Rice.

"People will hear what their ithing ears want them to hear." -God. Yes, this includes me, but what my ears wanted to hear was Biscut saying;"Yes we screwed up, we let public outrage, pressure- force us into releasing Rice. Proof of this are in his remarks about 1) rehiring Rice to work there 2) signing Stallworth 3) Ozzie's remarks that Ray told them exactly what was on the tape 4) They only cut him after the tape made it to the public. 5)Biscut order not one but two closed door meetings 5) Biscut mispoke/lied about the punishment the league would give- in other words, first he said the MAX Rice could get was two games and Steve thought maybe, 4-6 maybe, but it was not likely. Later on Biscut said he expected 4-6 games, maybe as much as eight. So how could he expect more than the max the league was allowed per CBA? My ears simply wanted to hear Biscut admit the public's reaction was why he cut Rice. How do we know? Because he said plainly, clearly, that if Rice had been suspended from the get go for 6-8 games, he would still be on the team. So yes, Biscut, once again, LIED to the public, to the media and thus, most of the things in the ESPN article are correct.