papasmurfbell Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/08/07/could-bernard-pierce-supplant-ray-rice/ The Ravens stubbornly have supported running back Ray Rice through his domestic violence incident, and for good reason. After signing him to a contract that paid out $25 million over the first two years of the five-year deal, the Ravens weren’t going to cut Rice as he approached the cheaper seasons of the front-loaded contract.Also, Rice continues to be the team’s best option at tailback. Teams don’t make examples out of key players; they save that for guys who were going to be cut anyway or who are replaced much more easily.But with Rice suspended for the first two games of the season and, according to Jamison Hensley of ESPN.com, Bernard Piece looking to be the best running back in camp, that could all change. Per Hensley, Pierce has made the smoothest transition to new offensive coordinator Gary Kubiak’s one-cut running scheme fueled by zone blocking.Pierce has been a solid contributor over the last two seasons, but hardly a star. As a rookie in 2012, Pierce gained 532 yards rushing. In 2013, he gained only 436 — averaging a mere 2.9 yards per carry.Then again, Rice didn’t do much better in 2013, gaining 660 yards and averaging only 3.1 per carry. With Pierce due to make $570,000 and $660,000 over the next two seasons and Rice slated to pocket $4 million and $3 million, respectively, the Ravens may at some point decide that Pierce provides the better dollar-for-dollar option. Quote
ForceEight Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 I think the cap cost savings of keeping vs. cutting Rice immediately dispel this notion. Quote
rastaman831226 Posted August 8, 2014 Posted August 8, 2014 Replace Rice? Not a shot. Pierce lacks Rice's durability and shelf life. Pierce, because of his running style ( upright and downhill ) has about 2 more years of NFL career left in him. Quote
papasmurfbell Posted August 8, 2014 Author Posted August 8, 2014 I think the cap cost savings of keeping vs. cutting Rice immediately dispel this notion.I think the idea is Pierce would take more caries. Sort of like how Willis was being paid as a starter and Rice was the starter. Quote
cravnravn Posted August 8, 2014 Posted August 8, 2014 Not if he fumbles in the red zone as we seen last night Quote
papasmurfbell Posted August 8, 2014 Author Posted August 8, 2014 Sure. He has not been a guy who is fumble prone. Rice has that rep but it is unfounded. Quote
tsylvester Posted August 8, 2014 Posted August 8, 2014 I think the rookie will over take them both, especially late in games if the Ravens have the lead and in the redzone. Quote
papasmurfbell Posted August 8, 2014 Author Posted August 8, 2014 Oh yeah to run a team out of time and exhaust them. Quote
52isUnstoppable Posted August 8, 2014 Posted August 8, 2014 From what I saw last night the Ravens have a very tough decision to make with these backs. Will they carry 4 RB's? Rice and Pierce are locks. Forsett has veteran experience, the inside track with Kubiak and he played well. Taliaferro played great and he was draft pick. I'm guess Forsett would be the odd man out here Quote
papasmurfbell Posted August 8, 2014 Author Posted August 8, 2014 I think Forsett will be carried for 2 games. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.