TBird Posted February 2, 2016 Posted February 2, 2016 I posted a link from Walter Football which is a respected site thatthe draft isn't too deep this year in talent. The Ravens site is now saying there will be premier talent in thelater rounds. Go to: www.baltimoreravens.com Quote
tsylvester Posted February 2, 2016 Posted February 2, 2016 Hopefully they are just blowing smoke to make it appear they will trade out... Yes, or is it no, this draft is not deep, not deeper than say 3 rounds. Quote
TBird Posted February 2, 2016 Author Posted February 2, 2016 LOL - Yea, that would be just like them to blow smoke at us this time of year. Great point. Based on what you said - it sounds like they want Treadwell but I posted a link Oz would have to trade down to get himbecause he's projected further down but will obviously rise up the boards after his official 40 time is after the combines in plus the otherstats. He'll be one of the fastest men in the draft if not the fastest. If they get TReadwell and Perriman comes back they'll have the two fastest guys in the last two drafts and watch Joego to work with them and SR and a bulked up Maxx. Quote
tsylvester Posted February 3, 2016 Posted February 3, 2016 Just because some sites rank him lower does not mean Oz does, nor does it mean he cannot be picked at 6. He or any player a team thinks is worth the spot, is all that matters. it's not as if the team will be prevented from taking a kicker there (Oakland) or get penalized for doing so... Treadwell is not a speed guy, he is a possession receiver who is strong enough to get off the jam, big enough and with great hands to give the team a great catch radius, and a true red zone threat. He is, in my opinion, worthy of the 6th pick because the team needs him badly and, there is no other receiver on the team or in the draft quite like him. Quote
thundercleetz Posted February 3, 2016 Posted February 3, 2016 Ts, I wonder what Treadwell checks in height wise. I remember Michael Crabtree was a consensus top ten pick. He was listed at 6'3" in college and only checked in at 6'1". Treadwell looks every bit 6'2" but you never know. Will it matter? How does Treadwell compare to Crabtree coming out? Quote
TBird Posted February 3, 2016 Author Posted February 3, 2016 Good points guys. You're right T. It's where Ozzie puts himon his board that counts and I know he's the bestreceiver and think it could be Treadwell or whoeveris left between Hargreaves and Ramsey. One of them should be there @ 6 and so will Treadwell. Cleets - Yea, Crabtree was a big let down and a dud in the SBand again the following year in Seattle on the last play beforethe next SB and he was covered like a blanket, same as JimmySmith shut him down in SB 47. That's why they have the combines - to get their exact measurementsand speed but the Baltimore Colts did pretty well in the draft longbefore the Combines. So did GB, NY, OAK and a lot of teams. The Combines just puts all the players and teams in one place at the same time for everyone to see and judge. And we still never know how well they will do like Crabtreetand Perriman last year who never stepped on the field. WR hasjust been Ozzie's achilles heel but he still has two rings. Quote
TBird Posted February 3, 2016 Author Posted February 3, 2016 T is right. Treadwell is not a speed guy but a possession receiverwho gets good separation and yardage after the catch according to this link. He's compared to Alshon Jeffery but Harmon of nfl.com sayshe's better. Couldn't find his speed stat, but he's tall enough at 6'2, 220 lbs and combinethat with Perriman's height over 6' and Joe has two pretty goodweapons if Perriman comes back. Treadwell is the best receiver in the draft. Sounds to me like Ozzie likes him and is going for him judging byhis statement at the top of this thread. He gets his playmaker withTreadwell and still gets defensive help in the later rounds. http://www.rotoworld.com/player/cfb/132057/laquon-treadwell Quote
tsylvester Posted February 4, 2016 Posted February 4, 2016 Ts, I wonder what Treadwell checks in height wise. I remember Michael Crabtree was a consensus top ten pick. He was listed at 6'3" in college and only checked in at 6'1". Treadwell looks every bit 6'2" but you never know. Will it matter? How does Treadwell compare to Crabtree coming out? Two issues Crabtree had were poor route running and inconsistent hands. Size wise, Treadwell is bigger both in height and physical mass; he is ripped. His hands as you know are incredible and he runs good routes, as with most college players, there is some there to clean up... but I never saw Crabtree as a top 10 pick, his speed and size is what enticed others. He has done a pretty good job with his hands, but nothing like he was "projected".... Quote
TBird Posted February 4, 2016 Author Posted February 4, 2016 Im fearful that Dallas will take him.NFL.com was saying they will take a QB for Romeo to groomwhich was the word out of their camp but Jones is now sayingthey can wait til next year to draft a QB and he wants a WRnow. It would be just like him to draft Treadwell just before us like whenhe traded in front of us to get DEZ. All the boards were doing amajor melt down but Ozzie could have had him. His pal Bellicheat called and said Dallas is on the phone and NEis on the clock. They want to jump up to take DEZ. Do you wantto up them Oz and he said no thanks. So he could have had him. Quote
tsylvester Posted February 4, 2016 Posted February 4, 2016 Dallas won't take him, they need far more help elsewhere. Some claim they will take the qb from North Dakota State, Carson Wentz, but I think that depends on if they sign RG or Manzel when the off season starts. The only real question, for me, is if Ramsey and Treadwell are there, as I suspect, what will the Ravens do? Trade back to say 9 with the Bucs who need corner help (Ramsey can play both) or maybe to 11 with the Bears who also need secondary help? Some mocks, for what they are worth, don't have a wide out going until the 20's, would the Ravens take that chance and trade that far back? Ramsey won't last that long.... Quote
TBird Posted February 4, 2016 Author Posted February 4, 2016 No way Ramsey lasts that long. In fact both him and Hargreavescould be gone by #6 but I doubt both will be. Jags draftingjust above us will take one of them so the other should bethere for us. As far as your Dallas comments, you know that and I know thatbut Jones doesn't know that. He wanted to draft Manzeil buthis super scout talked him out of it. Jerry's antics are why he hasn't been to the SB since around 97but he had Jimmy doing the draft who came out with the valuechart most teams including the Ravens use now or ratherJimmy's assistant created it. The chart helps determine the values players have and if sayFlacco should be drafted high where Ravens were or so theytrade down to get him which they did saving the owner millions. Quote
thundercleetz Posted February 4, 2016 Posted February 4, 2016 Two issues Crabtree had were poor route running and inconsistent hands. Size wise, Treadwell is bigger both in height and physical mass; he is ripped. His hands as you know are incredible and he runs good routes, as with most college players, there is some there to clean up... but I never saw Crabtree as a top 10 pick, his speed and size is what enticed others. He has done a pretty good job with his hands, but nothing like he was "projected"....Good point. Forgot about that Mike Leach Air Raid offense. I do remember his hands being suspect as well. I would be happy with either Ramsey or Treadwell. Need a playmaker. A LT would be a safe pick, but I think we could get by with an above average LT. Hopefully teams at the top will get QB hungry pushing down the best players. Quote
cravnravn Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 Leaveland will screw this draft up I can feel it, we getting Treadwell or Ramsey. Quote
tsylvester Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 Good point. Forgot about that Mike Leach Air Raid offense. I do remember his hands being suspect as well. I would be happy with either Ramsey or Treadwell. Need a playmaker. A LT would be a safe pick, but I think we could get by with an above average LT. Hopefully teams at the top will get QB hungry pushing down the best players. If Kelechi goes, I think they will panic and take the ND left tackle at 6, sadly. It is not as if they will start him at left tackle any way, and they have shown, the guys they have now can be serviceable. Tackle guards are pretty decent this year, they can find one of them later who can fill the same role as Ronnie Stanley. Quote
varaven45 Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 They need to retain KO; let Monroe go. I know its complicated but Monroe is not a long term sol'n; KO is. Be securing the OL, they can grab the CB or WR in the 1st round. Quote
tsylvester Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 They need to retain KO; let Monroe go. I know its complicated but Monroe is not a long term sol'n; KO is. Be securing the OL, they can grab the CB or WR in the 1st round. I agree. They need to send a message to the team and any possible free agents; talent is wanted and hard work is rewarded. Just pony up and pay Kelechi, he has earned it and they need a left tackle who also can play other positions if needed. Quote
oldno82 Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 They need to retain KO; let Monroe go. I know its complicated but Monroe is not a long term sol'n; KO is. Be securing the OL, they can grab the CB or WR in the 1st round. That's the scenario I favor. Osemele is worth keeping. But what happens to the cap if we do? I can't see right now how they could fit KO in under the cap. Unless...they trade Monroe for draft pick(s). I'd like to see that happen. Quote
thundercleetz Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 If Kelechi goes, I think they will panic and take the ND left tackle at 6, sadly. It is not as if they will start him at left tackle any way, and they have shown, the guys they have now can be serviceable. Tackle guards are pretty decent this year, they can find one of them later who can fill the same role as Ronnie Stanley.I agree with your sentiment. It would be great to get the next JO, but let's say even if we get the next Trent Williams, the team can only become so much incrementally better from a Pro Bowl LT. Look at the Browns with Joe Thomas. When they have Josh Gordon they are actually a threat to win games. IMO the marginal benefit of a Pro Bowl LT over an above average LT is not nearly as large as the marginal benefit to a team of an elite WR over an above average WR. Cut Monroe, keep KO and draft Treadwell. Quote
TBird Posted February 6, 2016 Author Posted February 6, 2016 A link I posted quoted KO that he wants to stay and Oztold him that he wants to sign him as LT so maybe he'llgive us a home town discount. Ozzie will try damn hard to sign him because LTs are hardto find as we have seen since JO retired. Look at all theones since then that haven't worked out. They can fit him under the CAP and cut Monroes who's CAPhit in dead money will be around $6M or so. If KO leaves Ozzie will definitely draft Ronnie Staly of Notre Damnwhom he can insert at LT and just forget about him. Tunsil is thebest LT and I've seen him going as high as # 1 in some mocks.I've also seen Bosa falling a bit so who knows. It's a shame if we have to use a #1 pick on LT because we needplay makers so bad and will have to wait another year to get whatwe need. We'll be lucky to get 1 if KO leaves and Ravensdraft Staley. Quote
oldno82 Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 If it meant keeping KO I would trade Monroe for anything we can get for him. Quote
Tornado700 Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 I'm all in for resigning K.O. If Michael Oher can become a servicable L.T., then so can K.O. They have to grab any receiver who is in the top ten. I'm still not sold on Perryman. He scares me. Quote
cravnravn Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 If we draft a position guy, we should use him at that position, not flip flop him around as we did Oher. We could of had another JO at LT. Quote
TBird Posted February 7, 2016 Author Posted February 7, 2016 Exactly, fans like to use that as an excuse for ruining Oherbut he was ruined before he came here but Ravensare always moving guys up and down the line.We won the SB when Caldwell moved KO back to LGand inserted Fat Mac to LT. If they draft Ronnie Staley, he will stay there ala JO.Ravens won't have to worry about the left side again soit's not a bad thing if we draft him. We're just going tohave to wait another year for a playmaker unless Ozziecan sign Von Miller. Quote
thundercleetz Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 Exactly, fans like to use that as an excuse for ruining Oherbut he was ruined before he came here but Ravensare always moving guys up and down the line.We won the SB when Caldwell moved KO back to LGand inserted Fat Mac to LT. If they draft Ronnie Staley, he will stay there ala JO.Ravens won't have to worry about the left side again soit's not a bad thing if we draft him. We're just going tohave to wait another year for a playmaker unless Ozziecan sign Von Miller.Not having to worry about LT for ten years hasn't helped the Browns much. We need playmakers who can get points on the board! Ravens haven't had a legit difference maker on offense in 20 years. If you have a chance to get Ramsey or Treadwell you get him! Btw there is no guarantee Staley will be the next JO. Remember, Eugene Monroe was the eighth pick overall and Jake Long was the first pick. Everyone likes to paint a rosy picture of LTs being super safe. While they might not be flat out busts, you might end up with a mediocre player at a position you could have addressed later in the draft. The Rams have wasted two first round picks on "safe" LTs in the past ten years. Alex Barron was the nineteenth pick in 2005 and Jason Smith was the second pick in 2009. Both are out of the league. Quote
oldno82 Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 Not having to worry about LT for ten years hasn't helped the Browns much. We need playmakers who can get points on the board! Ravens haven't had a legit difference maker on offense in 20 years. If you have a chance to get Ramsey or Treadwell you get him! Btw there is no guarantee Staley will be the next JO. Remember, Eugene Monroe was the eighth pick overall and Jake Long was the first pick. Everyone likes to paint a rosy picture of LTs being super safe. While they might not be flat out busts, you might end up with a mediocre player at a position you could have addressed later in the draft. The Rams have wasted two first round picks on "safe" LTs in the past ten years. Alex Barron was the nineteenth pick in 2005 and Jason Smith was the second pick in 2009. Both are out of the league. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.