papasmurfbell

So that Geico ad with Europe had me wondering. How much did they pay them? I don't see Europe having much demand so a $20-30 G's is what I was guessing.

I am for that.

It is from soon after them doing the deal.

You do know how to read don't you?

That isn't a quote?

The grass is shredded every single yr. they havebeen playing college and high school games there since the start. From the beginning they have talked about how bad the turf is. So try again your self.

Brady has played there and they still have it.

http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2013/05/28/joe-linta-agent-for-joe-flacco-defends-his-comments-about-ravens-front-office/

I am just saying that a game turning into a war of attrition is not a likely scenario.

It is home field advantage. They were smart and knew this would happen. The NFL can't do anything about it.

Maybe Suggs. We have no idea what Perriman is. Monroe has played a lot. It is more losing guys in the game. You can make adjustments with a week of practice. You can only dress 46 on game day so a reserve DL or WR that could help is not dressed.

All in all it is turning out to be a bad deal. I do remember him making a comment about how stupid the team was to not make a deal earlier.

So how many games can the Ravens rely on almost 10 guys from the other team getting hurt? More than anything in that game that is what won the game for the Ravens.

Yo are trying to spin now. You are trying to change the topic of the thread.

If you believe the Ravens make th ePO's this yr I have a bridge to sell.

So you ignore 2 other seasons. Well I guess whatever you have to do to justify something in your own head.

And for that 3 yrs the Ravens are a below .500 team. Tells me that the contract was not good for the team.

Halfway through the season about 400 yds. On par for when he was a Raven and SF is falling apart.

I remember him making them. He was gloating that he beat the Ravens. He sought out the media to make the comment.

agreed

Really not only does Joe need to rework his deal he should take a pay cut. That is the only way he shoudl stay. He has proven he can't carry the team and should adjust his pay to be just a cog.

But it is dealing with the problem one time. If you wait for 2017 then you have to deal with the problem twice.

Because if they decide to keep him then they will have to find 10+ players on the roster to get under the cap. Then in 2017 they will have to do that again. It would be Joe and a bunch of slap nuts. So I am wondering who is wearing #5 here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkRHdHZpN_E http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/0ap3000000439714/Flacco-intercepted-in-the-endzone http://www.raiders.com/media-vault/videos/Ravens-Joe-Flacco-intercepted-by-Raiders-Neiko-Thorpe/718f4d1b-1d18-4cec-979b-a4a4b5ab60d1

In what part when I brought up Q did I mention rings? The topic of the thread is about production. Seems you want to change the idea of the topic to suit yourself.

If Joe doesn't renegotiate then it is a position that is not secured. It would be a full rebuild so you would be using the time to clean the cap as well.