Jump to content
ExtremeRavens: The Sanctuary

oldno82

Full Member
  • Posts

    5,307
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    72

Everything posted by oldno82

  1. Heap was 32. There's some feeling the Harbaugh's might deal in the first.
  2. Sounds like 4 games to me. The video TMZ published was pretty disturbing and we haven't even seen the elevator video.
  3. I haven't been an advocate of trading down in this year's draft because I was thinking we could get a stud player ready to play now with the 17th choice. But now I'm hearing the top 4 tackles will be gone, Clinton-Dix will be gone, Evans and Watkins will be gone. If it really plays out like that I could see us moving back in the first round. I hope it doesn't happen that way. Lately Oz hasn't been doing well after falling back. I don't think Pryor is the safety we need. Ward is. But hell yeah, Max. I'm counting down the days! I just want to have a first round pick who's a starter no matter where we draft in that round.
  4. I haven't been an advocate of trading down in this year's draft because I was thinking we could get a stud player ready to play now with the 17th choice. But now I'm hearing the top 4 tackles will be gone, Clinton-Dix will be gone, Evans and Watkins will be gone. If it really plays out like that I could see us moving back in the first round. I hope it doesn't happen that way. Lately Oz hasn't been doing well after falling back. I don't think Pryor is the safety we need. Ward is.
  5. Sure is a sorry trail of attempts by this organization to find a starting qb. It took a long time and lots of disappointments before we got to Joe. On the other hand, some organizations never get it right. I wonder what the Browns are going to do in the first round this year.
  6. GEEZ! Don't spoil it for me...I've just finished watching Season 1!
  7. Yeah, I agree we'll take the best player ready to start. I'll go out on a limb and say Lewan or Martin.
  8. You must be reading my mind!
  9. That's true, Crav, but even doing BPA there should be a guy we need who is a BPA or close to it at 17.
  10. Too many good players around in the first 17 picks to trade back. I want to see a RT either Lewan or Zack Martin as the first pick. If they do anything I want them to do whatever they have to do to get Jimmie Ward in the second, even if it means moving up. The last few years we haven't done so well getting picks to play right away as regulars because we've been drafting so far down. I will say I trust Oz and de Costa a lot more than Preston.
  11. Didn't hear a word about that at the time. We just would have been exchanging one looney for another.
  12. To me, those picks would be solid choices. And, yeah, I'd move up in the 2nd to get Ward if we have to.
  13. I don't really know the guy. That's why I was asking. Like you I thought he might fit in as a temporary RT for a year or two giving Ozzie more latitude in the first round of the draft. But, maybe Oz is going to definitely go with a young drafted T. I'd be tempted to take one of the top OT's over Clinton-Dix. It will definitely be an interesting first round. The Ravens will likely have a lot of options.
  14. Any opinions on this guy? We need a RT but should we see how round 1 plays out? Think we can grab or will grab a T with the first pick? What if Clinton-Dix is available at 17? Thoughts?
  15. The more I think about this, the more I think it stinks. We're trying to install a new offense, get the new OC acclimated, get the O-line guys practicing and learning together, and trying to keep everybody healthy. I don't look at it as a good time to put on a 'family football show' just to satisfy the Harbaugh's.
  16. I don't have any issue with this as it's all for charity.
  17. What is the problem with Carr as a backup?
  18. I may be wrong, but I thought the Maryland Stadium Authority was funded by the lottery.
  19. I just don't think the NFLPA will ever go for this. Not on the current CBA anyway.
  20. That's seems the best outcome to me too.
  21. As bad as he is, Snyder is worse.
  22. Honestly, I don't want to have a 17 or 18 game schedule. It would kill the players who are already too banged up by the 14th week let alone a 17th or 18th week. All I'm saying is that IF an 18 game schedule is what they go to, they're going to need more players to give others a break.
  23. It could be done. Rosters back in the 70's were 45 players and the league gathers absolutely huge revenues and profits now.
×
×
  • Create New...