Jump to content
ExtremeRavens: The Sanctuary

Haslam: We’re not the same old Browns, not the Three Stooges


papasmurfbell

Recommended Posts

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/12/30/haslam-were-not-the-same-old-browns-not-the-three-stooges/

Browns owner Jimmy Haslam appeared before the Cleveland media today to announce the firing of head coach Rob Chudzinski and said the reason for the firing was simple: The team needs to get better.

Haslam told reporters that he hates hearing people refer to these Browns — who have gone either 4-12 or 5-11 in each of the last six seasons — as the same old hapless losers.

“There’s nothing — and you all have every right to write it — that galls me more than to read on Monday mornings, ‘Same old Browns.’ Because that’s not what we’re all about, and that’s not what we came here for,” Haslam said.

One reporter at the press conference asked Haslam whether he, Browns CEO Joe Banner and G.M. Mike Lombardi are “The Three Stooges running this organization.” Haslam insisted that he and the men he hired know what they’re doing, although he acknowledged that firing the head coach after one 4-12 season will be met with some skepticism.

“We deserve the skepticism,” Haslam said.

Haslam said he and the front office will search for as long as it takes to find a coach he’s confident can win.

“We want an individual who’s a strong winner, who knows how to win football games,” he said. “I don’t know if it’ll take a week or a month.”

However long it takes, Haslam needs to find some coach who will make the Browns a better team — a coach who won’t be mentioned alongside failed recent coaches in Cleveland like Romeo Crennel, Eric Mangini, Pat Shurmur and now Rob Chudzinski.

 

 

 

threestooges.jpg?w=250

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/12/30/browns-ask-permission-to-interview-broncos-oc-adam-gase/

 

Browns ask permission to interview Broncos OC Adam Gase

Apparently, Larry, Curly, Moe and company want to interview someone who may not be old enough to remember the Three Stooges.

According to Jeff Legwold of ESPN.com, the Browns have already asked the Broncos for permission to interview offensive coordinator Adam Gase for their head coaching vacancy.

Gase can interview this week since the Broncos have a bye, though there’s no indication that anything has been scheduled.

The 35-year-old Gase is a fast-track offensive whiz kid, who has also emerged as a possibility in Minnesota.

He has no head coaching experience, and just one year as a coordinator in the NFL. He’s benefitted from being able to call plays for some guy named Peyton Manning (such that anyone truly does), and that’s worked out OK for both of them.

The attraction to a young quarterback tutor like Gase is obvious, since the Browns have a pair of first-round picks, giving them the ability to use one to acquire a(nother) quarterback of the future. And it would also be an obvious departure from conventional wisdom, which the Browns are fighting hard to convince people they’re getting away from.

So you want to hire a guy who was dictated to what the offense will be by hi sQB. Sure that will workout well.

 

 

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7x5LLotfgrw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/02/14/could-haslam-try-to-stiff-banner-and-lombardi/

 

Could Haslam try to stiff Banner and Lombardi?

As the hiring and firings mount in Cleveland, so do the buyouts financed by owner Jimmy Haslam.

It’s hard not to wonder whether, at some point, Haslam will try to stiff one or more of his former employees out of the ongoing pay to which they’re otherwise entitled.

Typically, coaches, General Managers, and other executives are paid for the rest of their contracts, if they’re let go. Teams can block the ongoing payment only by firing those employee “for cause.”

The standard contractual language for these non-union employees grants the Commissioner the power to resolve any disputes that may arise.

Ultimately, there’s nothing to lose. At least not financially. While it could hurt Haslam’s perception in league circles (especially when he tries to make more hires), there’s no tangible penalty for taking a chance at refusing to pay an employee.

Most states have wage payment laws the entitle employees who are stiffed to treble damages or other punitive payments, along with attorneys’ fees. For the NFL, the owner who loses the arbitration determined by the Commissioner ends up paying only what he would have paid in the first place.

Still, there are other costs. At a time when the Browns already are viewed by many (not just those in the local media) as a dysfunctional mess, the Browns would only make things look worse by trying to reduce the natural financial consequences of firing so many people by trying not to pay them what their contracts say they should get.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...