GrubberRaven Posted February 16, 2016 Posted February 16, 2016 When Bill Cosby's past came up, there was nothing that could really shock me anymore...I'm pretty saddened by this Quote
papasmurfbell Posted February 16, 2016 Posted February 16, 2016 With the UT Title 9 suits and this case being used as an example would Peyton or Jamie Naughright be put on the stand? Quote
dc. Posted February 17, 2016 Posted February 17, 2016 Likely not. Maybe the victim. But Title IX is about systemic response to these kinds of situations, but not really an individual situation or crime. So trainer could perhaps testify, but less about the crime and more about her experience with how it was handled. Even then, though, I doubt it. These cases tend to be more about the higher up officials and the way they respond. Quote
papasmurfbell Posted February 17, 2016 Posted February 17, 2016 I don't know how a Title 9 case is handled. I wasn't sure if they had to go about fact finding to find out of the event was real or contrived. Quote
cravnravn Posted February 17, 2016 Posted February 17, 2016 Fact is, when poppa manning paid the settlement with the woman, one of the stipulations was that neither side was to speak about the incident. 2007 poppa and pay pay write a book and totally slander her. This is going to get good. Quote
GrubberRaven Posted February 17, 2016 Posted February 17, 2016 http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/feb/16/reason-peyton-manning-/ Quote
Spen Posted February 17, 2016 Posted February 17, 2016 http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/feb/16/reason-peyton-manning-/I can say I heard of the case the first time about a month before the Super Bowl and then a couple times after that but still before the Super Bowl. I think it was coming out more and more regardless of who won. Quote
dc. Posted February 17, 2016 Posted February 17, 2016 I don't know how a Title 9 case is handled. I wasn't sure if they had to go about fact finding to find out of the event was real or contrived.Fact finding could lead to deposition, but I doubt it. Again, maybe with the victim. But title IX tends to stay as analysis of the system at the university and most discussions will be from the top looking down. They could highlight specific cases as examples, even then it would mostly be about what the school did not what Peyton did. That's where the victim could come in to testify about how she felt school treated her and the situation, but I see very little reason the suspect would ever be called as an actual witness or even deposed to discuss how allegations were handled. Quote
dc. Posted February 17, 2016 Posted February 17, 2016 Also just found this: http://www.usnews.com/news/sports/articles/2016-02-16/lawyer-in-title-ix-case-says-focus-is-ut-not-peyton-manning Lawsuit is technically about cases between 2013 and 2015, Manning case cited only as history and background along with many other cases in last 20 years. So it won't go anywhere near him or her. Quote
vmax Posted February 17, 2016 Author Posted February 17, 2016 They need to get the facts straight.Manning didn't moon her. He did a Full Constellation. Quote
cravnravn Posted February 17, 2016 Posted February 17, 2016 They need to get the facts straight.Manning didn't moon her. He did a Full Constellation.Full month teabag is what I heard Quote
vmax Posted February 17, 2016 Author Posted February 17, 2016 Full month teabag is what I heard Do you think the young Manning had an arse beard in those days? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.