GrubberRaven Posted July 26, 2016 Posted July 26, 2016 http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000676829/article/ravens-add-fourtime-pro-bowl-ot-jake-long Quote
tsylvester Posted July 26, 2016 Posted July 26, 2016 Good move, nothing to lose, everything to gain. Quote
vmax Posted July 26, 2016 Posted July 26, 2016 Insurance, if he passes the physical. They needed a policy.Good signing, but he's just a back up this point in his career. Quote
oldno82 Posted July 27, 2016 Posted July 27, 2016 tsyl is right. Nothing to lose. I really doubt we see this guy running with the first stringers. Man, back to back years of a torn ACL...makes Perriman look healthy. Quote
varaven45 Posted July 27, 2016 Posted July 27, 2016 Good depth signing. Nothing more, nothing less. Quote
tsylvester Posted July 29, 2016 Posted July 29, 2016 Hold the phone! He refused to sign the injury waiver the team wanted, thus he is a free agent.... Quote
Robjr83 Posted August 1, 2016 Posted August 1, 2016 I'm sorry did Peter the terrible by the team? Quote
papasmurfbell Posted August 15, 2016 Posted August 15, 2016 It was a good move to let him go. With his injury history you have to be careful. Quote
tsylvester Posted August 15, 2016 Posted August 15, 2016 I disagree. He was a back up, quality back up at that with great experience. That money, even if he got hurt was not going to hurt the cap. Quote
papasmurfbell Posted August 15, 2016 Posted August 15, 2016 I have yet to see the value of the deal. Quote
tsylvester Posted August 15, 2016 Posted August 15, 2016 I have yet to see the value of the deal. Because the deal was cancelled.... Quote
papasmurfbell Posted August 15, 2016 Posted August 15, 2016 Then how do you know that it wouldn't hurt the cap? Quote
tsylvester Posted August 15, 2016 Posted August 15, 2016 Then how do you know that it wouldn't hurt the cap?I know the cap and the team's cap, you know this old buddy... Sure, maybe he takes the place of a younger, healthier tackle/ guard who would out perform him, but the odds are not in favor of that option. Quote
papasmurfbell Posted August 15, 2016 Posted August 15, 2016 The OT they drafted I believe in the 4th might have been that option and all I have read is they expect him to start one day. But again how do you know his deal would not have effected the cap since it was never put out? Quote
tsylvester Posted August 15, 2016 Posted August 15, 2016 The OT they drafted I believe in the 4th might have been that option and all I have read is they expect him to start one day. But again how do you know his deal would not have effected the cap since it was never put out? 1 + 1 = 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.