papasmurfbell

They should have done what I said in the spring of 2013. They should have traded him. They could have had their pick of QBs. since then.

How does questioning you not thinking facts don't exist make sense? Your line of reasoning I am equating with Kellyanne Conway's alternative facts concept.

Probably win. But they better not take Cle for granted. They have done that in the past and lost.

You disagree with a fact? So after the game on Sunday bmore fans and media outlets can say they won and the Cle fans and media can disagree and say they won? There can be alternative facts?

So you are saying that Joe has not had interception problems in that past is a fact?

No you omitted that reality.

Yep. See realities.

So Joe has not been interception prone in the past?

How about keeping an eye on the issues of the team.

21 games in 3 seasons does not show the ability to stay healthy.

Then he is hurt during his game back. He can't survive in the NFL anymore.

Canady will be eligible after 7 more weeks. The way they pick up injuries do you think they will need that 2nd spot for a more important player? Danny would be hurt within another 2 weeks anyways.

http://sportsnaut.com/2017/09/ravens-place-rb-danny-woodhead-injured-reserve/ A single game. How useful and effective.

So if some of Joe's near picks had actually been intercepted the outcome would have been the same? And you want to put it in Joe's hands?

I figure Jansen will not be starting by Oct.

When a guy has bc injury prone they are predictable.

I think the over under on game Danny plays should be 6.

No just a realist.

AP is done. CK will be blackballed from their league forever I think.

How about seeing reality? I see things as they are and nope wish for rainbows and unicorns.

Just signed and he is already restructuring. That is not a good sign.

He couldn't even throw for 150 yds. He looked like crap throwing. I actually do know a great deal about football pro or not.

I am not the only one who thinks your comments are suspect.