tgann68 Posted December 1, 2013 Posted December 1, 2013 Does anybody else get the feeling this team (like last years in Denver NE and SF SB) either likes or just plays better as the under dog. It's what I think and with Pitta back won't be surprised to see them go on a run "as the underdog". ;) Quote
oldno82 Posted December 1, 2013 Posted December 1, 2013 I think we need to keep things in perspective. A couple of weeks ago we were really down on the team and now I'm afraid the purple-colored glasses are out in full force. We have a very tough road ahead to make the playoffs or win the division and this team isn't exactly blowing anybody anyway. If the AFC wasn't so weak we wouldn't stand a chance. 1 Quote
papasmurfbell Posted December 1, 2013 Posted December 1, 2013 Seeing things in reality and perspective is needed. Quote
vmax Posted December 1, 2013 Posted December 1, 2013 Seeing things in reality and perspective is needed. "Why?" Quote
tgann68 Posted December 2, 2013 Author Posted December 2, 2013 I'm looking at this team and giving an honest account. Our D front 7 and secondary is playing ridiculous; Defense wins championships. Our offense has been playing better and has lost 4 games at 3 or under points. We catch a break in two of those games and we lead the division. With Pitta back we are going to be tough we absolutely need him in the redzone. I am up on this team not bc I'm a homer but bc we have a chance and they won a championship last year by streaking in December. LET'S GO RAVENS! Quote
vmax Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 I'm looking at this team and giving an honest account. Our D front 7 and secondary is playing ridiculous; Defense wins championships. Our offense has been playing better and has lost 4 games at 3 or under points. We catch a break in two of those games and we lead the division. With Pitta back we are going to be tough we absolutely need him in the redzone. I am up on this team not bc I'm a homer but bc we have a chance and they won a championship last year by streaking in December. LET'S GO RAVENS! Quote
RavenMad Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 I'm still not sure we are improving quick enough to be able to reach the playoffs and if we do, be able to win a game in the playoffs unless it's against the Colts. There are still too many issues that are going unresolved week to week. John keeps spouting about the small incremental steps of development the team is taking but at some point they are going to have to take a leap forward. Quote
varaven45 Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 Excellent point(s) RavenMad. It will be interesting to see how this team responds in the wake of last Thursday's win vs. Steelers. Under Harbaugh, this team frequently lays an egg after a big, emotional win.Its going to be a very, very challenging final 4 game stretch, starting Sunday. Lets see if they take a leap forward. Quote
tgann68 Posted December 2, 2013 Author Posted December 2, 2013 I remember how I felt goon ino December last year; not good. Then they snapped off some very important wins and the rest is history. For the first time in 2 months we have a shot embrace it. Quote
papasmurfbell Posted December 3, 2013 Posted December 3, 2013 I'm looking at this team and giving an honest account. Our D front 7 and secondary is playing ridiculous; Defense wins championships. Our offense has been playing better and has lost 4 games at 3 or under points. We catch a break in two of those games and we lead the division. With Pitta back we are going to be tough we absolutely need him in the redzone. I am up on this team not bc I'm a homer but bc we have a chance and they won a championship last year by streaking in December. LET'S GO RAVENS!That was how it used to be. The NFL has ruled that D's don't win championships anymore. Quote
varaven45 Posted December 3, 2013 Posted December 3, 2013 That was how it used to be. The NFL has ruled that D's don't win championships anymore. Except the Seattle Seadogs have one helluva D and odds on to make it to and win the SB. In fact, there D and Carolina's remind me of our 2000 D.Ours was superior but the tenacity and sense of urgency of Carolinas and Seattle's is similar. A solid D, while not required, still wins championships. Quote
tgann68 Posted December 3, 2013 Author Posted December 3, 2013 That was how it used to be. The NFL has ruled that D's don't win championships anymore.I disagree. Even with all the changes to favor offenses in the past few years our team with an average offense and great "bend but don't break" red zone defense played the two best offenses in the league last year at their home field and won. Then won a Super Bowl the same way. If your D can limit their scoring and your Offense can score 20 points you can win. Quote
papasmurfbell Posted December 3, 2013 Posted December 3, 2013 Except the Seattle Seadogs have one helluva D and odds on to make it to and win the SB. In fact, there D and Carolina's remind me of our 2000 D.Ours was superior but the tenacity and sense of urgency of Carolinas and Seattle's is similar. A solid D, while not required, still wins championships. That offense they have is no joke. I disagree. Even with all the changes to favor offenses in the past few years our team with an average offense and great "bend but don't break" red zone defense played the two best offenses in the league last year at their home field and won. Then won a Super Bowl the same way. If your D can limit their scoring and your Offense can score 20 points you can win.You can't ride a bend don't break. The offense has to do something. Quote
ForceEight Posted December 3, 2013 Posted December 3, 2013 I disagree. Even with all the changes to favor offenses in the past few years our team with an average offense and great "bend but don't break" red zone defense played the two best offenses in the league last year at their home field and won. Then won a Super Bowl the same way. If your D can limit their scoring and your Offense can score 20 points you can win.i think that kind of speaks to Papa's point. Defense is extremely important (e.g. a balanced team), but you can't go in with a superb defense and nothing else anymore and expect to win. We did that, Tampa did that, etc. Defense doesn't win championships. It only helps win them. Quote
papasmurfbell Posted December 3, 2013 Posted December 3, 2013 i think that kind of speaks to Papa's point. Defense is extremely important (e.g. a balanced team), but you can't go in with a superb defense and nothing else anymore and expect to win. We did that, Tampa did that, etc. Defense doesn't win championships. It only helps win them.Exactly. Well said. Quote
52isUnstoppable Posted December 3, 2013 Posted December 3, 2013 Exactly. Well said. i think that kind of speaks to Papa's point. Defense is extremely important (e.g. a balanced team), but you can't go in with a superb defense and nothing else anymore and expect to win. We did that, Tampa did that, etc. Defense doesn't win championships. It only helps win them. That's not what Ray Lewis says.... EVERY F*CKING MONDAY NIGHTT!!!!!! There is no way they bring him back next year. Every single time they ask him a question or its his turn to comment on a play, all Ray says is "I'm still a firm believer that defenses win championships" There is no insight or anything remotely interesting about his commentary Quote
tgann68 Posted December 3, 2013 Author Posted December 3, 2013 I didnt say "0" offense and a great D.The emphasis for the whole league is offense and if u have an average offense complimented with a score stopping D u can win championships. We proved it last year. Does anyone on here think our offense was great last year? Not me but our D could stop u in the Red Zone as they can this year. I like our chances. Quote
papasmurfbell Posted December 3, 2013 Posted December 3, 2013 That's not what Ray Lewis says.... EVERY F*CKING MONDAY NIGHTT!!!!!! There is no way they bring him back next year. Every single time they ask him a question or its his turn to comment on a play, all Ray says is "I'm still a firm believer that defenses win championships" There is no insight or anything remotely interesting about his commentaryRay is delusional thinking that D's can be like the 2000 team. He also believed he was still one of the best. I didnt say "0" offense and a great D.The emphasis for the whole league is offense and if u have an average offense complimented with a score stopping D u can win championships. We proved it last year. Does anyone on here think our offense was great last year? Not me but our D could stop u in the Red Zone as they can this year. I like our chances.The 2000 D was as close to "0" offense as you can get. Quote
OutsideRzAcE Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 The D is good but still inconsistent. I'm not ready to say we can hang our hat on defense just yet. Suggs isn't producing lately and Pitt just shredded our Red zone D. I will say noone in the AFC scares me right now. Quote
tgann68 Posted December 4, 2013 Author Posted December 4, 2013 I agree the 2000 team had 0 offense but I was talking about the 2012 team. 1/2 Offense and great red zone D can win. Quote
papasmurfbell Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 I really have no idea who will rep the AFC in the SB. Every team has huge problems with it. Quote
papasmurfbell Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 Sry listening to something while typing. Every PO eligable team has huge issues. Quote
tgann68 Posted December 4, 2013 Author Posted December 4, 2013 I agree with that. Their is no defined or dominant team of the AFC. It's why if we make the playoffs we have a punchers chance IMO. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.