rastaman831226 Posted February 11, 2014 Author Posted February 11, 2014 Crazy idea but why don't we wait and see what the game plan is and wait and see if Joe can handle it before we say he can't. Stupid to predict failure when we dying know exactly what the offense will be or the personnel we will have.After 6 years you still don't recognize what Joe Flacco can or cannot do? What planet are you on? Quote
rastaman831226 Posted February 11, 2014 Author Posted February 11, 2014 except he did throw them prior, as I said, when he had a few experienced receivers. ....... illegite. Quote
Geronimo Posted February 11, 2014 Posted February 11, 2014 i don't have a problem with waiting and seeing, i've only seen Joe in this offense so i don't know if he can run a different offense, but what i do know is he better work his ass off to learn the new offense. i don't want him pouting or complaining about anything, just learn the new damn offense and make it work. thats your job and thats why you're making 62.5 over 3 Quote
RavenMad Posted February 11, 2014 Posted February 11, 2014 i don't have a problem with waiting and seeing, i've only seen Joe in this offense so i don't know if he can run a different offense, but what i do know is he better work his ass off to learn the new offense. i don't want him pouting or complaining about anything, just learn the new damn offense and make it work. thats your job and thats why you're making 62.5 over 3 OMG, I agree with a Geronimo post. 2 Quote
Geronimo Posted February 11, 2014 Posted February 11, 2014 (in my james earl jones voice) WELCOME, now one guy i think could and should be very valuable in this quasi WCO is Juice. The guy can do too much not to use, and from what i remember of the WCO the FB is used more than in any other offense. Juice can be moved around, looking at his college film, he played TE, H-back, FB and even lined up in the slot. let the Juice loose, Leach is the better blocker, Juice does everything else better. Quote
Money Posted February 11, 2014 Posted February 11, 2014 Crazy idea but why don't we wait and see what the game plan is and wait and see if Joe can handle it before we say he can't. Stupid to predict failure when we dying know exactly what the offense will be or the personnel we will have. No way. This is GerRastaMo's time to "shine". If you remember, GerRastaMo was nowhere to be found on this board during the playoff run. He showed back up when Flacco signed his contract and Boldin was traded. If he can't bitch and moan and do his best Chicken Little impersonation, he won't post. Quote
papasmurfbell Posted February 11, 2014 Posted February 11, 2014 So? What's wrong with utilizing weapons? Darren Spoles and Pierre Thomas combined for 148 receptions from dump off Brees. The Broncos RB rotation combined for 92 receptions from dump off Manning. Shane Vereen caught 47 passes from dump off Brady in only 8 games. There is nothing wrong. Take what the give you but then take more than that. If dumping off frees up WR's as well as working to free them to get big gains then all is good. Quote
Geronimo Posted February 11, 2014 Posted February 11, 2014 No way. This is GerRastaMo's time to "shine". If you remember, GerRastaMo was nowhere to be found on this board during the playoff run. He showed back up when Flacco signed his contract and Boldin was traded. If he can't bitch and moan and do his best Chicken Little impersonation, he won't post. I've been a member on this board since july 2013, 6 months after the Ravens Superbowl run, so how could i do what you are claiming i did? This Money guy is a liar that is stalking me, look Money i don't want male groupies, we had a deal , keep my name out of your mouth and we won't acknowledge one another, you can't seem to honor a deal and your word means nothing. Liar, stalker, male groupie, doesn't keep his word, has no honor, SMH. Quote
Money Posted February 11, 2014 Posted February 11, 2014 I've been a member on this board since july 2013, 6 months after the Ravens Superbowl run, so how could i do what you are claiming i did? This Money guy is a liar that is stalking me, look Money i don't want male groupies, we had a deal , keep my name out of your mouth and we won't acknowledge one another, you can't seem to honor a deal and your word means nothing. Liar, stalker, male groupie, doesn't keep his word, has no honor, SMH. Who the fuck was talking to you troll??? Quote
thundercleetz Posted February 12, 2014 Posted February 12, 2014 What a shit show someone please lock this thread. Quote
vmax Posted February 12, 2014 Posted February 12, 2014 What a shit show someone please lock this thread. We'll call this the bathroom thread. If we lock it, then we'll just be cleaning up shit on the living room floor. 3 Quote
Robjr83 Posted February 12, 2014 Posted February 12, 2014 What a shit show someone please lock this thread.You may kill the thread.. but the butt hurt trolling will still continue 2 Quote
rastaman831226 Posted February 13, 2014 Author Posted February 13, 2014 Don't quite understand why Mods here discourage long threads. One would think that a sites' value is measured by the activity it attracts. The better sites attract many more views and many more replies. This site does not. Are the Mods restricting activity on this site because they do not wish to become bigger and better? Quote
vmax Posted February 13, 2014 Posted February 13, 2014 Don't quite understand why Mods here discourage long threads. One would think that a sites' value is measured by the activity it attracts. The better sites attract many more views and many more replies. This site does not. Are the Mods restricting activity on this site because they do not wish to become bigger and better? Good thing that you asked. We spend untold hours and very large amounts of money a week trying to figure out how we can remain a small and obscure site. Once a thread topic gets more than 2 replies we scramble to see how we can stop it. At the top of our agenda items this week we are currently deadlocked on the issue of warning posters if they post more than 2-3 posts a week. Half of us are leaning toward 2. Using the Ignore button on everybody is another action item. 4 Quote
oldno82 Posted February 13, 2014 Posted February 13, 2014 Good thing that you asked. We spend untold hours and very large amounts of money a week trying to figure out how we can remain a small and obscure site. Once a thread topic gets more than 2 replies we scramble to see how we can stop it. At the top of our agenda items this week we are currently deadlocked on the issue of warning posters if they post more than 2-3 posts a week. Half of us are leaning toward 2. Using the Ignore button on everybody is another action item. Quote
tsylvester Posted February 13, 2014 Posted February 13, 2014 Good thing that you asked. We spend untold hours and very large amounts of money a week trying to figure out how we can remain a small and obscure site. Once a thread topic gets more than 2 replies we scramble to see how we can stop it. At the top of our agenda items this week we are currently deadlocked on the issue of warning posters if they post more than 2-3 posts a week. Half of us are leaning toward 2. Using the Ignore button on everybody is another action item. Phat, drunk & stoopid has paid off fer ya Max! ~ Quote
rastaman831226 Posted February 14, 2014 Author Posted February 14, 2014 Good thing that you asked. We spend untold hours and very large amounts of money a week trying to figure out how we can remain a small and obscure site. Once a thread topic gets more than 2 replies we scramble to see how we can stop it. At the top of our agenda items this week we are currently deadlocked on the issue of warning posters if they post more than 2-3 posts a week. Half of us are leaning toward 2. Using the Ignore button on everybody is another action item.Well then congratulations are in order. You've spent untold hours and very large amounts of money a week trying to figure out how to remain a small and obscure site. You've successed. Not a knock - just an observation. Quote
cravnravn Posted February 14, 2014 Posted February 14, 2014 Don't quite understand why Mods here discourage long threads. One would think that a sites' value is measured by the activity it attracts. The better sites attract many more views and many more replies. This site does not. Are the Mods restricting activity on this site because they do not wish to become bigger and better?Nobody locked this thread it's still open.. it's comedy at its finest starting with post 1 Quote
vmax Posted February 14, 2014 Posted February 14, 2014 Well then congratulations are in order. You've spent untold hours and very large amounts of money a week trying to figure out how to remain a small and obscure site. You've successed. Not a knock - just an observation. Congratulations are in order for you too! Part of our plan was "How can we annoy posters and kill threads?"You have no idea how much time we spent setting the bait to get you over here. Finally you took it. Quote
Spen Posted February 14, 2014 Posted February 14, 2014 (edited) Don't quite understand why Mods here discourage long threads. One would think that a sites' value is measured by the activity it attracts. The better sites attract many more views and many more replies. This site does not. Are the Mods restricting activity on this site because they do not wish to become bigger and better?No mod has restricted anything. A sites value can also be judged by the quality of its posts. The same stupidity you post over and over whether the topic is relevant or not does not help the site either. No one is going to read your posts and think good things about this place. And don't feighn shock or unhappiness at me calling you stupid. You work very hard to present yourself that way. Might as well leave this thread open, they will post the same crap in other threads anyway. Edited February 14, 2014 by Spen Quote
thundercleetz Posted February 14, 2014 Posted February 14, 2014 No mod has restricted anything. A sites value can also be judged by the quality of its posts. The same stupidity you post over and over whether the topic is relevant or not does not help the site either. No one is going to read your posts and think good things about this place. And don't feighn shock or unhappiness at me calling you stupid. You work very hard to present yourself that way. Might as well leave this thread open, they will post the same crap in other threads anyway.Great post. Exactly when I was getting at when I said someone should lock the thread. The thread started with an intelligent discussion but has regressed to name calling and insults. Nothing of value is being presented. Quote
Geronimo Posted February 14, 2014 Posted February 14, 2014 Might as well leave this thread open, they will post the same crap in other threads anyway.Show me other threads where i post the same crap, or are you a liar just like the rest of them. Quote
Geronimo Posted February 14, 2014 Posted February 14, 2014 No mod has restricted anything. A sites value can also be judged by the quality of its posts. No one is going to read your posts and think good things about this place. ^^^^^^^^^ you have some nerve posting this when on the RAY RICE thread your contribution was talking about penis', flaccid and what do you think of when you hear Big Ben. LOL, you're a joke. Quote
GrubberRaven Posted February 14, 2014 Posted February 14, 2014 Are we sure OldSchool isn't Geronimo or Rasta, or both? 1 Quote
deeshopper Posted February 14, 2014 Posted February 14, 2014 Are we sure OldSchool isn't Geronimo or Rasta, or both? If they are or not, I certainly treat them the same. 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.